



Contents
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
1
|
Preamble
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The Airport Authority Hong Kong (ˇ§AAHKˇ¨) is responsible
for operations of the Hong Kong International Airport (HKIA). Its HKIA
Master Plan 2030 (MP2030) recommended expansion of HKIA into a three-runway
system (3RS) (ˇ§the Projectˇ¨) as the best way forward to cope with the
projected increase in air traffic demand and to secure the continual growth
of HKIA operation for the benefit of the economic development of Hong
Kong. For planning purposes, this development option for HKIA received
approval in principle from the Government of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) on 20 March 2012. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Study
Report for the Project was prepared in accordance with the study brief
requirements (ESB-250/2012) issued by the Environmental Protection Department
(EPD). The EIA Report for the Project (Register No. AEIAR-185/2014) was
approved by EPD on 7 November 2014 and the Environmental Permit (EP) (EP No.
EP-489/2014) granted on 7 November 2014. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
As part of the EIA Study, AAHK has proposed to formulate and implement a Marine
Ecology and Fisheries Enhancement Strategy (MEFES). The MEFES for
the Project has been set up for the purpose of enhancing the marine
environment for the benefit of marine ecology (including Chinese White
Dolphins (CWDs)) and fisheries resources in the vicinity of the project area,
in Hong Kong western waters and further afield into the Pearl River Estuary
(PRE). It is also for the purpose of providing support and assistance to
affected fishers to achieve more sustainable fishing operations. Figure 1.1 presents a
schematic overview of the different elements of the MEFES and their proposed
funding sources. Details of the MEFES are provided in Annex A. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
In accordance with EP Conditions 2.8 and 2.13, AAHK
will establish independent Marine Ecology Enhancement Fund (MEEF) and
Fisheries Enhancement Fund (FEF), respectively, to fund initiatives proposed
by third‐parties
(eg Non‐Governmental organisations
(NGOs), researchers and the fishery sector) that support the objectives of
the MEFES. A Marine Ecology Conservation Plan (MECP) and a Fisheries
Management Plan (FMP) are developed to describe the proposed mechanism for
the implementation of the MEEF and FEF as well as the goals and themes under
which funding applications can be made. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
This document presents the FMP of the 3RS Project. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
2
|
Introduction
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2.1 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
As part of commitments
included in the EIA Study, the AAHK proposed to formulate and implement a
MEFES. Initiatives under the MEFES will be to assist fishers operating in the western Hong Kong
waters who may need to change fishing activities due to the proposed Project,
and to enhance marine ecology and fisheries resources in western Hong Kong
waters especially Lantau waters (refer
to Section 14.11 of the EIA Report). Through its discussions
with stakeholders and experts, AAHK identified the following key enhancement
aspects for inclusion in the MEFES: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Following
a request for further information, supplementary information to the EIA Study
was provided to EPD to elaborate the commitments for the MEFES that were
outlined in Section 14.11 of the EIA Report (available at http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_2232014/further_info/pdf/Marine_Ecology_and_Fisheries_Enhancement_Plan.pdf
). |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The three
key enhancement aspects were discussed in more detail in the supplementary
attachment, and opportunities for additional enhancement of marine habitats
during construction phase were also described. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Supplemental
information was also provided to outline the public consultation/ stakeholder
engagement plan for proposed arrangements for funding and management of the
enhancement initiatives, through the establishment of the FEF and MEEF and
the associated Fund Management Committees. Details of the mode of
operation of the Committees, as well as procedures for allocating and
awarding funding, were proposed to be devised in consultation with relevant
stakeholders before commencement of construction. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Additional
detail on the design, operation and management of the MEFES and the
implementation of the FEF and MEEF was presented in the 200th
meeting of the Advisory Council on the Environment (ACE) held on 15 September
2014 which discussed the EIA Report of the 3RS Project. ACE provided
views on the EIA report to the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP)
with conditions that AAHK shall establish independent MEEF and FEF for
implementation of a MECP and a FMP. AAHK shall
also set up a management committee for each of the funds. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The Permit
conditions set out in the EP ([1]) related to the submission of a
FMP and the establishment of a FEF are as follows. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
For TABLE |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
2.2 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
As stated in the MEFES and EP
Condition 2.13, the purpose of the FMP is, in essence, to support the fishing
industry and enhance fisheries resources in the western Hong Kong waters
especially the Lantau waters. A management committee will also be set
up for the FEF with members from fishermen and relevant stakeholders for
effective implementation of the FMP. By assisting third parties through
the provision of funding for relevant measures and initiatives, AAHK intends
to create the necessary stimulus to support the enhancement of fisheries
resources and sustainable development of the fishing industry. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
This FMP outlines the proposed mechanism for the implementation, the funding arrangement, and the setting up of a management committee for the FEF to manage and administer the FMP. Some potential fisheries management, support and enhancement initiatives are also included in an annex to this document to provide assistance to the management committee in effectively implementing the FMP. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Structure of the FMP |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
3
|
Organisation, Management and Administration of the
FMP
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Geographical Coverage |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The FMP has been formulated for
the management, support and enhancement of the fisheries resources and the
fishing industry in western Hong Kong waters especially the Lantau
waters. The area of interest for this FMP therefore includes marine
waters and habitats surrounding the 3RS land formation and north and west
Lantau waters. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It should be noted that the
initiatives and measures introduced to the fisheries habitats and fishing
grounds of the area of interest could potentially introduce longer term
benefits to the fisheries of adjacent marine waters. Also
the area of interest can go beyond that identified above if it is reviewed in
the future that management, support and enhancement initiatives and effort
are well spent in this area and other areas in the vicinity would benefit
from AAHKˇ¦s enhancement strategy. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.2 |
Over-Arching Aspects |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Annex B provides
a high-level description of the physical and fisheries characteristics of
western Hong Kong waters, in particular north and west Lantau waters.
This review provides the basis for identifying key habitats, species or
ecological resources that may warrant focused effort in supporting the
fishing industry and enhancing fisheries resources under the FMP. A
summary map of the identified sites of fisheries importance in north and west
Lantau waters is presented in Figure
3.1.
From the information presented it is noted that there are aspects of the
broader environment that provide opportunities for supporting the fishing
industry and enhancing fisheries resources. The EP for the 3RS Project
references the above in Condition 2.13 as follows: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
ˇ§The Plan shall be prepared in
collaboration with fishermen for supporting the fishing industry
and enhancing fisheries resources in the western Hong Kong
waters especially the Lantau watersˇ¨ |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.2.1 |
Support the Fishing Industry |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Given the numerous challenges facing the Hong Kong industry culminating from a variety of circumstances over many years, AAHK is committed to identifying opportunities to assist fishermen operating in the western Hong Kong waters. In order to provide extra assistance to the affected fishermen or fishing communities, and also to promote the sustainable development of the fishing industry as a whole, the FMP is tailored towards having a series of initiatives and incentives to help achieve sustainable fishing operations. A majority of these support measures are developed in collaboration with fishermen to ensure that they are practicable, feasible and fit for the sustainable modes of operations and businesses of the fishermen. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.2.2 |
Enhancement of Fisheries Resources |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
AAHK has identified the
potential to enhance habitats for fisheries resources in nearby sites of
fisheries importance and beyond during project development and
operation. Habitat enhancement is expected to occur over time in particular from the expanded matrix of marine protected
areas, potentially bringing benefits to fisheries resources and subsequently
to fishermen operating in north and west Lantau waters. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Engagement
with the Fishery Sector for Preparation of FMP |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
As part of the preparation of this FMP, consultations with the fishery sector have been undertaken to better understand their specific needs for support which could be formulated under the FMP. Focused discussions in the form of face-to-face meetings with representatives of the fishermen associations were completed. These consultations were conducted in 2015 with the LegCo member of the Agriculture and Fisheries Functional Constituency, Hong Kong Fishermen Consortium, the Aberdeen Fisher Womenˇ¦s Association, the Hong Kong Fishermenˇ¦s Association, the Hong Kong Fishery Alliance, Lamma Island Fishing Promotion Association as well as fishermen representatives from Tuen Mun, Tung Chung, Tai O, Tsuen Wan, Cheung Chau, Lamma Island and Aberdeen. Overall the consultees acknowledge AAHKˇ¦s effort in assisting the industry through the FMP and the associated FEF and are supportive of the FMP of the 3RS Project. Ideas on specific support and enhancement initiatives or incentives have been provided and these have been incorporated into this FMP where possible. Valuable feedback on the experience that they have for applying for similar funding has been shared with a view to improving the administration and operation of the FEF, and comments on the membership and operation of the management committee of the FEF were also sought. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It is AAHKˇ¦s intention to continue this open dialogue with the fishery sector during the development and implementation of the FMP. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
Goal |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
As described in Section 14.11 of the EIA report, the ultimate goal of the MEFES is to provide support to assist fishermen operating in the western Hong Kong waters who have faced an increasingly difficult operating environment in recent years, and enhance marine ecology and fisheries resources in western Hong Kong waters especially the Lantau waters. In this way, the implementation of the 3RS Project is intended to provide an opportunity to give cumulative benefit to fisheries resources and the fishing industry in north and west Lantau waters. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.5 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The MEFES prepared as part of the EIA Study led to development of a preliminary budget estimate for the MEEF and FEF. The two Funds would be in total in the order of HK$200 - 300 million, subject to approval from the Board of AAHK. Subsequently during the ACE discussion, AAHK had committed a substantial sum of up to HK$150 million for each Fund, and both Funds were initially planned to run for around 10 years, with a large portion of the fund expected to be used for scientific research, studies and follow-on actions/ initiatives in the initial years. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
To meet the goal and objectives of the FMP, substantial resources, both financial and manpower support, are essential. Therefore an independent FEF, managed by a management committee, will be established for effective implementation of the FMP. It is noted that the FEF is intended to fund studies and projects that are non-profit making in nature only. Exceptions may be made for studies and projects with a commercial element to demonstrate the technical feasibility and commercial viability of new sustainable fisheries practices and this would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This is further described in the guidance notes of the FEF. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.5.1 |
Fisheries Enhancement Fund (FEF) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
MEFES prepared as part of the EIA Study led to development of a preliminary
budget estimate for the MEEF and FEF. The two Funds would be in total
in the order of HK$200 - 300 million, subject to approval from the Board of
AAHK. Subsequently during the ACE discussion, AAHK had committed a
substantial sum of up to HK$150 million for each Fund, and both Funds were
initially planned to run for around 10 years, with a large portion of the
fund expected to be used for scientific research, studies and follow-on
actions/ initiatives in the initial years. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Recommendations
from initial discussions with fishermen representatives highlighted the need
to provide sufficient resources for the long-term and sustainable fisheries
conservation and enhancement effort. In response to the
recommendations, the initial plan to run the FEF for around 10 years has been
reviewed and it is apparent that a fund that can support initiatives over the
long term would be much preferred and in line with the fishing industryˇ¦s
expectation. To achieve this it is considered
that an endowment fund arrangement whereby seed money is invested to target
the generation of investment return to meet an annual budget (ˇ§Annual
Allocationˇ¨) that is able to support the FMP in the
long term. The endowment fund arrangement is targeted to generate 4%
annual return based on an optimistic forecast. In the
event that the expected investment return is not achieved, any
shortfall below the Annual Allocation as approved by the Steering Committee
is proposed to be topped up by an additional top-up fund to ensure that
resources to support FMP are not compromised. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
On the basis of the above, AAHK
proposes that a funding amount of HK$100 million is to be put under an
endowment arrangement targeted to generate an income of HK$4 million to
support FEF initiatives for long-term and sustainable fisheries conservation
and enhancement efforts. This amount is proposed with consideration of
the potential return that can be deemed adequate to fund projects of various
scales and duration. In view of the possible fluctuation of investment
income and the need for stable funding support, in
particular for the initial years of its implementation, it is proposed
to establish an additional HK$100 million top-up fund for both MEEF and FEF
to meet any shortfall on investment income below the
Annual Allocation for the FEF. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
In
addition, as the key objectives of FEF are to support the fishing industry
and to enhance fisheries in western Hong Kong waters consequent to 3RS
construction, it is expected a significant portion of the funding support
would need to be deployed in the initial years, particularly during the
marine construction stage of the project. It is therefore proposed to
allocate HK$50 million at the onset of FEF. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
In
summary, AAHK proposes the following arrangement for the FEF: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
above fund arrangement is illustrated in Figure 3.2. The
proposed arrangement provides an initial quantification of funds committed
for implementing the FMP, representing AAHKˇ¦s commitment in contributing to
enhancing fisheries resources and supporting the fishing industry in
practical and effective ways in north and west Lantau waters. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
proposed funding application, approval and allocation mechanism will be
further developed and described in detail in the instrument constituting the
fund, the guidance notes and application form for the fund. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.5.2 |
Proposed Fund Management Structure |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
FMP will be launched in consultation with relevant stakeholders, in particular the fishing industry. Consequently, in order to formalise the process and provide a platform
for dialogue AAHK will establish a management committee (FEF-MC) to
administer the FEF for the effective implementation of the FMP. In
addition, a Steering Committee is proposed to be established to provide
overall directional guidance / policies for the fund operation to enable
sufficient resources will remain available for the fund to meet its
objectives in a long-term and sustainable manner. The FEF-MC will
approve recommended funding applications that are within the Annual
Allocation. The Steering Committee will not override FEF-MC decisions
on funding application approvals within the Annual Allocation and will not
undermine the role of the FEF-MC. The management arrangement of the FEF
is illustrated in Figure 3.3. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Fisheries Enhancement Fund Management Committee (FEF-MC) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It
is envisaged that the FEF-MC will be composed of a membership including AAHK,
Fishermenˇ¦s Association representative(s) and fisheries expert(s).
Relevant stakeholders (including, but not limited to, community leaders,
people having expertise/ experience in managing similar funds, academic(s)
and green group representative(s)) would also be considered for appointment
into the management committee. The exact membership will be determined
subject to agreement from potential candidates. AAHK will serve (or will
procure a third party to serve) as the Secretariat for the FEF-MC. The
setup and operation of the FEF have made reference
to the AFCDˇ¦s Sustainable Fisheries Development Fund. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
remit of the FEF-MC will be to manage and operate the FEF so
as to ensure that funds are granted to studies and projects relevant
and appropriate to the key themes and initiatives of the FMP. Its
primary role is to determine the criteria for the selection of initiatives to
be funded by FEF, to make recommendations on funding applications that meet
the fund objectives and approve the applications that are within the Annual
Allocation approved by the Steering Committee. The FEF-MC will study
the proposals and report the approved applications to the Steering
Committee. If the recommended funding support exceeded the proposed Annual
Allocation in any
particular year, the FEF-MC will present the recommendations to the Steering
Committee for consideration and approval of the shortfall from the HK$50
million jump start amount and when the HK$50 million jump start amount has
been depleted, then from the top-up fund. For each approved
application, appropriate reporting on progress is required and the FEF-MC will
monitor and review the project outcomes, including the effectiveness of the
approved applications in achieving the goals and objectives of the FEF, so
as to make
necessary refinement/ adjustment to future funding focuses. The
draft terms of reference for the FEF-MC (which will be subject to review /
revision by the committee members) has been prepared and is included in Annex
C. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Steering Committee |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
AAHK
proposes to establish a Steering Committee to provide overall directional
guidance / policies for the operation of the FEF to enable sufficient
resources will remain available for the fund to meet its objectives in a
long-term and sutainable manner. Its
functions will include: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Besides,
if the total funding amount of the applications recommended by the FEF-MC
exceeds the Annual
Allocation, the
Steering Committee may exercise its discretion to approve the recommended application(s)
for funding support by drawing the shortfall from the top-up fund. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It
is envisaged that the Steering Committee will be chaired by the AAHK and
composed of the chairperson of the FEF-MC, chairperson of the MEEF-MC and
other non-AAHK members nominated by reputable organisation(s) in the
environmental management, engineering, investment, or financial areas.
For clarity, there does not need to be a member in each of the areas referred
to above and the members may be nominated by one or more reputable
organisations. The exact membership will be determined subject to
agreement from potential candidates. AAHK will serve (or will procure a
third party to serve) as the Secretariat for the Steering Committee. It
should be noted that the Steering Committee is also proposed to provide
oversight to the MEEF and MECP to be prepared under separate cover. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Appointment Procedure |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
Secretariat will invite reputable organisations in the environmental
management, engineering, investment, or financial areas to nominate person(s)
having relevant professional expertise / experience to occupy the seats of 4
member(s) of the Steering Committee. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
Secretariat will: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.5.3 |
FEF-MC Membership |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It
is suggested that the membership reflects the four broad themes that will
comprise the FMP. The FEF-MC will provide balanced views on on-going
fisheries operation and sustainable management and enhancement of fisheries
resources. It is proposed that the committee will comprise of 11 to 13
members (including the Chairperson), including Fishermenˇ¦s Association
representative(s), Fisheries Expert(s), Relevant Stakeholder(s) and up to 2
representatives nominated by AAHK. It is envisaged that AAHK will not
chair the FEF-MC. The code of conduct will be agreed amongst the
FEF-MC. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Fishermenˇ¦s Association representative(s) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Fishermenˇ¦s
Association representative(s) will be engaged as the member(s) of the FEF-MC
to oversee the need of the projects, especially in the Fisheries
Industry theme and provide comments to enhance current fisheries operations
to develop sustainable fisheries industry. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Fisheries Expert(s) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Fisheries
expert(s) will be engaged as the member(s) of the FEF-MC to oversee the
potential benefits of the projects in all themes to consider whether the
projects could enhance fisheries resources to achieve sustainability.
Fisheries expert(s) will also review the
proposed assessment for the measurement of project performance as well as
provide comments to enhance the effectiveness of the projects. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Relevant Stakeholder(s) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Relevant
Stakeholder(s), such as members from fisheries trade business and aquaculture
technology , will be engaged as the member(s) of the
FEF-MC to oversee the potential benefits of the projects in all themes.
They will justify the proposed assessment for the measurement of project
performance as well as provide comments to enhance the effectiveness of the
project. Community leader(s) as well as people having expertise /
experience in managing similar funds will also be considered for appointment
into the FEF-MC to provide advice on the fund administration and help
streamline the implementation and management of the fund. In addition,
academic(s) and green group representative(s) would also be invited to join
the FEF-MC to provide balanced views on on-going fisheries operation and
sustainable management and enhancement of fisheries resources. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
AAHK Member(s) |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
As
the core focus areas of the FEF-MC are sustainable fisheries industry and
community benefits, it is suggested there will be up to 2 representatives
nominated by AAHK on the Committee, which may include the associated
specialist / environmental consultant(s). |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Appointment Procedure |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
Secretariat of the FEF-MC will compile a list of potential candidates
including, but not limited to, any member of any consultative and advisory
committee of the AFCD to be the Chairperson and members of the FEF-MC that
satisfy the composition stated above. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
Secretariat will invite the potential candidate(s) to be Chairperson or
member(s) of the FEF-MC. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
Secretariat will appoint the candidate(s) to be Chairperson or member(s) of
the FEF-MC upon their acceptance. If potential candidate(s) declined
the invitation, the Secretariat will propose alternative candidate(s) to
ensure that the FEF-MC would meet the composition requirements stated above. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Each
member of the FEF-MC will be appointed for a fixed term of 3 years, unless
otherwise agreed with that member. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.5.4 |
Secretariat Structure, Role & Responsibilities |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
AAHK
will provide secretarial services (or will procure the provision of
secretarial services by an external third party) to the FEF to facilitate the
functions of the Steering Committee and the FEF-MC. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
secretariat will: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.6 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It is expected that criteria for
the selection of successful initiatives for funding will be formulated and
agreed by the FEF-MC. The Steering Committee will not override a
decision of the FEF-MC and will not undermine the role of the FEF-MC.
In general, it is anticipated proposals will be evaluated based on the
strength of their contribution to MEFES objectives and the overarching
aspects stated in Section 3.2 in terms of providing the outcomes that will
clearly benefit habitats and species and stakeholders (public and fishers ([2])) (Figure 3.4). It is expected that while proposals may
focus on one theme, they may be able to contribute across other themes, which
could be taken into account in evaluations. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.7 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It
is expected that the FMP will be implemented throughout the construction and
operation phases of the 3RS Project. AAHK endeavours to implement the
FMP and approve and allocate funding to studies and projects that meet the
goal and objectives of the FMP as soon as practical subject to the timely
establishment and recommendations from the FEF-MC. A tentative
programme for the implementation of the FMP is presented in Table
3.1.
The AAHK has been conducting consultations with relevant stakeholders and the
AFCD to formulate the FMP. It is expected that the FMP will be
submitted to ACE for comment in Q4 2015, followed by submission to the DEP in
Q1 2016. The establishment of FEF and FEF-MC will commence after the
final approval by the DEP and the fund is planned to
be in place for application in Q3 2016. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Table
3.1
Tentative Programme for the Implementation of FMP |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
3.8 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
In
order to determine
whether the FMP is successful in achieving the goal presented in Section
3.4 it is important to implement a mechanism for reviewing and evaluating
the success of the Plan and supported initiatives. Review and
evaluation mechanisms are proposed for each of the four themes in Section
4. The FEF-MC
will monitor the performance of the funded applications so
as to make necessary refinement/ adjustment to future funding focuses. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4
|
Key
Themes of the FMP
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
4.1 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The FMP aims to achieve its goals through the
following key objectives: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The FMP is therefore organized into four themes,
each of which is developed further and discussed in detail below. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
A key theme of the FMP is to support measures that
help to achieve sustainable management and enhancement of fisheries
resources, which further ensures sustainable fisheries resources rather than
facilitating the fishing sector to increase their catch. It is
important to note that the concept of sustainable fisheries is also embedded
in the other three key themes of the FMP whereby sustainable modes of
operation and alternative livelihood and business
opportunities will be supported; consequently an
enhancement of fisheries resources is expected when fishing effort is kept
within sustainable levels. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
4.1.1 |
Support Measures that Help
to Achieve Sustainable Management and Enhancement of Fisheries Resources |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Certain management measures, controls and restrictions
can be explored and undertaken to enhance fisheries resources. Examples
include training to fishermen on the concept of sustainable fisheries in order to raise their awareness of the long-term
ecological and economic importance of conserving and enhancing fisheries
resources in Hong Kong. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
4.1.2 |
Support and Enhance On-going Fisheries Operations in a Sustainable Manner |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Given the challenges facing the marine capture fishery industry (refer to Annex B), it is considered critical to propose initiatives
under the FMP to support and enhance on-going fisheries operation in the
north Lantau waters in a sustainable manner. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.1.3 |
Support Measures that Assist
in Shifting Fisheries Operations |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Although initiatives are provided to support the ongoing fisheries operations within the north
Lantau waters as well as ensure operators explore new fishing grounds, it is
considered possible that some operators may want to change their livelihood
considering the challenging operating environment. Alternative livelihoods may include aquaculture which is considered as a practical
alternative for capture fishermen to make a living using their knowledge on
fisheries operations in the marine environment. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.1.4 |
Support the Promotion and Enhancement of
Fisheries-related Business Opportunities
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Certain business opportunities are noted to be
fisheries-related and can thus be adopted by the fishery communities.
Examples include fisheries-based eco-tourism where tourist can tour the Hong
Kong fishing grounds and observe fishing operations onboard. Fishermen
using their vessels may also be engaged in eco-tourism related to dolphin
watching and recreational fishing. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.2 |
Goals and Objectives |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.2.1 |
Support
Measures that Help to Achieve Sustainable Management and Enhancement of
Fisheries Resources
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
goal of the current theme of ˇ§Support Measures that Help to Achieve
Sustainable Management and Enhancement of Fisheries Resourcesˇ¨ is to promote
sustainable fisheries for the ultimate benefit of conserving and enhancing
fisheries resources in a long term. Specific objectives under this
theme are as follows: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.2.2 |
Support and Enhance On-going Fisheries Operations in a Sustainable Manner |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
main goal of the Support and Enhance On-going Fisheries Operations in a
Sustainable Manner Theme is to ensure that the affected fisheries
operations in the north Lantau waters
can be sustained and promoted to allow fishermen to address the challenges
facing the industry which have culminated from a variety of circumstances in
recent years. The
specific objectives of this theme are as follows: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.2.3 |
Support Measures that Assist in Shifting Fisheries Operations |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
goal of the Support Measures that Assist in Shifting Fisheries Operations
Theme is to assist fishermen in developing alternative livelihoods related to
aquaculture.
Specific objectives of this theme are: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.2.4 |
Support the Promotion and Enhancement of Fisheries-related Business Opportunities |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The
goal of the current theme of ˇ§Support the Promotion and Enhancement of
Fisheries‐related Business Opportunitiesˇ¨ is to assist fishermen in
developing fisheries-related business opportunities. Specific
objectives under this theme are as follows: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.3 |
Potential Initiatives |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Indicative
example initiatives under each of the four themes are provided in Annex D. The
initiatives are not
considered to be definitive, but demonstrate
some possible opportunities under the MEFES for
developing sustainable fishing industry and fishery resource enhancement in
western Hong Kong waters. It
should be noted that the actual initiatives to be undertaken under each theme
will be proposed by third-party applicants for consideration by the FEF-MC. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.4 |
Implementation and Funding |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
The initiatives of the four
themes involve substantial activities that need to
be conducted during the construction and operational phases of the 3RS development. It should be noted that as
the funding applications for each initiative will depend on interest of
applicants, it is not possible to estimate funding allocation for individual
initiatives at this stage. Funding for initiatives will be as per
funding agreements between third-party applicants and the FEF-MC and are also
not included in this FMP. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
It is expected that initiatives submitted by third-parties
will have focused implementation/work plans yet to be discussed with AAHK and
FEF-MC and that these would be separate activity driven documents and not
included within this FMP. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.5 |
Roles and Responsibility |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Several entities
are identified who will be integral to achieving the overall goal of the four
key themes. These entities and their roles and responsibilities of
these entities are presented below. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
4.6 |
Review and Evaluation |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
In order to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of
supported initiatives under the four themes, a process of ongoing performance
evaluation is proposed. It is suggested that performance evaluation shall be arranged around groups of specific high level
performance indicators. The example performance indicators envisaged at
this early stage are detailed in Annex D. The FEF-MC will monitor the performance of
the funded applications so as to make necessary
refinement/ adjustment to future funding focuses. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
5
|
Summary
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
This document presents details on the proposed
mechanism for the implementation, the funding arrangement, and the setting up
of a management committee for the FEF to manage and administer the FMP.
It aims to support the fishing industry and enhance fisheries
resources in the western Hong Kong waters especially the Lantau waters during the construction and the operation of the
Project. In addition, the document contains information
on the goal, management and administration of the FMP and introduces the four
themes that when implemented are expected to achieve the stated goal.
These themes are: |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
To support the initiatives with the stated goals and
objectives in a long-term and sustainable manner, it is considered that an
endowment fund arrangement whereby seed money is invested to generate an
annual investment return that is able to support the
FMP in a long term. In the event that the
targeted investment return is not achieved, any shortfall below the Annual
Allocation is proposed to be topped up by an additional top-up fund to ensure
that resources to support FMP are not compromised. A significant
initial allocation outside of the endowment arrangement is also proposed to
jump start the implementation of the FMP in the initial years of
establishment. It is important to note that the endowment fund with top-up
fund arrangement would allow funds to be available sustainably and AAHK will ensure the FMP is implemented in
compliance with the requirements of Condition 2.13 of EP No. EP-489/2014 and
have oversight of the implementation of studies and projects under the key
aspects and initiatives of the plan. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
AAHK will establish a FEF-MC, composing of members
from AAHK, fishermenˇ¦s association representatives, fisheries experts and
relevant stakeholders (including, but not limited to, community leaders,
people having expertise/ experience in managing similar funds, academic(s)
and green group representative(s)) to administer the FEF for the effective
implementation of the FMP and approve the applications that are within the Annual Allocation. In addition, a Steering Committee is
proposed to be established to provide overall directional guidance / policies
for the fund operation to enable sufficient resources will remain available
for the fund to meet its objectives in a long-term and sustainable
manner. It is planned to establish the FEF and FEF-MC in Q2 2016 and
initiate fund application in Q3 2016, subject to the final approval by DEP. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
([1]) http://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/permit/latest/ep4892014.htm ([2]) Fishers refer to fishermen and people related to fishing industry. |
|||||||||||||||